Saturday, July 09, 2005

m-pyre horoscopes

marjorie says...

folks who know me will be surprised by this, but i was pretty floored by these crosswinds horoscopes. written by eric francis of "planet waves" for the week of July 6- 13, they are simply completely right on. so, here are m-pyre's horoscopes - can folks guess which M goes with each?

1. You need to decide if you feel insecure or daring. It’s torture feeling both, and really, I doubt you’re actually feeling insecure. What I would guess you’re feeling, from the look of the New Moon chart this week, is the sense that you really want to take a chance but that there is a security factor to which you must attend. If you can start with that and work your way forward, you may find that any sense of a divided mind eases off. In fact you are in a safe and protected environment, and you’re unlikely to take on anything that exceeds your level of actual responsibility.

2. (intro sentence with astrology verbiage about signs and moons…) Together, these influences will function like a great wave of progress. But you need to be guided and propelled by the aspects rather than push yourself. Much like when someone gets a cast taken off, it’s not a good idea to overdo it. At the same time, you need to stretch a little. Living with the kinds of limitations you’ve lived with has taught you a lot, and you’ll be able to use that knowledge all your life. Now, gradually, another approach to existence begins to take center stage.

3. You’re being asked to live without something, or to live as if you were without it. Think of this something as part of yourself. Imagine that you’re in a psychological experiment where you’re relieved of the burden of self-consciousness. You’re free to be you without that peculiar human quality of regret, or of seeking something better in the past or future. Note how you relate to your own needs in this space, particularly your need for companionship. Notice how it feels to offer yourself to others from this unusual point of clarity.


Blogger Arvin Hill said...

1. Maggie
2. Mikaela
3. Marjorie

11:05 AM  
Blogger Maggie said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

11:41 AM  
Blogger marjorie said...

Ok -- since this is going to get buried and no one else is going to respond...

1. maggie
2. marjorie
3. mikaela

Arvin - was that just random, or were you putting two and two together?

11:55 PM  
Blogger Arvin Hill said...

No, I was made a real effort. I would've been disappointed if I hadn't gotten at least one right. (But I've never been a very good sleuth.)

1:16 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home